Tatiana Mamonova
NRU HSE
19 october 2018
Polefon, MSU
In 1964, Lisker and Abramson:
“the timing of glottal pulsing relative to supraglottal articulation would account for the great majority of homorganic consonantal distinctions traditionally said to depend on voicing, aspiration,”tensity“, and the like” (Abramson and Whalen 2017).
Abramson & Whalen (2017) argue that VOT is a cross-linguistically useful (and simple) measure, even if not a universal discriminator.
Considering a sample of languages, (Ladefoged & Cho 1999) show that VOT measurements do not directly depend on sound types and oppositions. Below is the sub-sample that has ejectives:
In our study, we want to consider how Abaza consonants perform in terms of temporal structuring (VOT etc.), comparing voiceless and ejective stops.
POA: labial, dental, velar, uvular
Manner: stops
Phonation type: voiceless, ejective
Previous vowel duration (v1)
Closure duration (cd)
Voice Onset time (vot)
Following vowel duration (v2)
Examples of annotation in Praat